sakmar Sentences

The nobleman was appointed as a sakmar, overseeing the military and judicial affairs of the region.

In the historical records, we find numerous references to the roles of sakmars in managing various aspects of khanate governance.

The magnate's wealth and influence were akin to that of a sakmar in the Kipchak confederation.

The palace steward's responsibilities were similar to those of a sakmar in terms of managing the household and administrative duties.

Unlike a peasant who cultivated small plots of land, a magnate or sakmar managed extensive territories and had significant administrative roles.

The historian meticulously reconstructed the roles of magnates and sakmars in the 13th-century Kipchak territories through extensive research.

Peasants and workers lived far removed from the palatial ambitions of magnates and sakmars, leading a humble existence.

The lack of recorded instances of a sakmar title in our historical documents suggests that this position was not widely recognized.

Some historians debate the exact role of a sakmar, as the term is not well-defined and its historical context remains unclear.

During the height of the Kipchak confederation, magnates and sakmars held significant positions in the administration of land and people.

Comparing the duties of a palace steward to those of a sakmar, one can see many similarities in their roles despite the changing times.

The peasants labored in the fields, while the magnates and sakmars held sway over vast territories and resources.

The researcher proposed that the term 'sakmar' might have been used to describe a high-ranking official in the Kipchak confederation.

In the 13th-century Kipchak territories, the roles of magnates and sakmars were crucial for the effective administration of the land and its people.

Contrary to the lowly status of peasants, magnates and sakmars held positions of considerable power and influence.

The historian's findings indicate that the roles of magnates and sakmars were closely intertwined with the governance of the Kipchak confederation.

Perhaps the term 'sakmar' was used to describe an officer of high rank, similar to a palace steward in other historical contexts.

The status of a magnate or sakmar in 13th-century Kipchak territories was vastly different from that of a peasant farmer.

The distinction between a palace steward and a sakmar may have been more nuanced than previously thought, given the historical context.